Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Harold Mayot vs Brandon Stringfellow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mayot vs Stringfellow analysis and find out who is favored!
Harold Mayot vs Brandon Stringfellow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mayot 1 - 0 Stringfellow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mayot has won 51.43% of points on his second serve, while Stringfellow has won 36.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mayot, in recent form, has won 51.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stringfellow has won 44.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.17% and 5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mayot has saved 66.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stringfellow has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mayot has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 42/ 32), with Stringfellow winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mayot has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 80% (W/L 4/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 39). Stringfellow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/ 15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Mayot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/ 19), where as Stringfellow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mayot winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mayot winning 2 and Stringfellow winning 0. The last match between Mayot and Stringfellow was at the Phoenix Challenger, 11-03-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Harold Mayot getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mayot and Stringfellow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mayot winning 0 times and Stringfellow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mayot winning 0, and Stringfellow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mayot has played against opponents with an average rank of 281.57 while Stringfellow has played against players with an average rank of 418.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mayot has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stringfellow has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mayot has converted 49.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stringfellow has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mayot 1 - 0 Stringfellow
130
Rank
112
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
55% (138-114)
Career Total W/L
40% (10-15)
58% (23-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$157,465
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mayot VS Stringfellow H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Harold Mayot | Brandon Stringfellow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:14 | 1:8:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 43% (20/47) | 58% (31/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 95% (19/20) | 61% (19/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 36% (8/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (26/53) | 28% (13/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mayot VS Stringfellow H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Harold Mayot
Player
Brandon Stringfellow
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Harold Mayot | Brandon Stringfellow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (23/17) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (51/39) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (460/405) | 25% (4/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 198 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:21 | 1:8:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.28 | 418 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1700/2816) | 58% (31/53) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1184/1700) | 61% (19/31) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (574/1116) | 36% (8/22) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (116/236) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1050/2689) | 28% (13/47) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (22/37) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (22/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (22/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (18/3) | 0% (1/0) |
Harold Mayot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Harold Mayot
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Tristan Lamasine
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Harold Mayot
53%
(
57 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
39 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Harold Mayot
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Valentin Vacherot
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Harold Mayot
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Pedro Cachin
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Stringfellow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Brandon Stringfellow
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Perry Gregg
Player
Brandon Stringfellow
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Brandon Stringfellow
35%
(
12 of
34)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mayot Vs Stringfellow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
